The effectiveness of regulations preventing alcohol-related road traffic crashes and fatalities in the European Union countries.

INTRODUCTION: This article addresses the impact of policy measures on the number of alcohol-related crashes and fatalities in European Union countries. In particular, it assesses (1) whether mild or severe penalty measures should be used to reduce the number of crashes and fatalities caused by alcohol; and (2) whether alcoholic beverages should be treated differently or proportionally to their alcohol content. METHODS: This study analyzed the number of alcohol-related crashes and fatalities in 24 European Union countries between 2002 and 2014. The methodology involved fixed-effects panel models, models with instrumental variables, the Hausman-Taylor model, and seemingly unrelated regressions (SUR). SUR improve the results of coefficient estimates when the data are not complete. RESULTS: The results of the SUR indicated that vehicle impoundment, community service, and alcolocks correlate with lower crashes, while detention correlates with lower fatalities. Furthermore, a higher alcohol content in beverages is positively associated with fatalities and negatively associated with the number of crashes. CONCLUSIONS: Mild and harsh measures for preventing alcohol-related crashes and fatalities differ in effectiveness; therefore, they should be used simultaneously. Blood alcohol concentration limits were found to be an ineffective tool for preventing crashes and fatalities under the influence of alcohol. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The regulatory restrictions on different types of alcohol should be stricter for hard alcohol (especially spirits) and lower for low-alcohol beverages, such as beer, if fewer fatalities are preferred to fewer crashes.

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Assessment of Healthcare and Anxiety Disorders in Patients with Chronic Diseases.

(1) Background: We compared the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the functioning and mental health of chronically ill patients, namely those with hemodialysis (HD) and diabetes (DM). (2) Methods: We used a questionnaire to collect the medical data and the Generalized Anxiety Questionnaire (GAD-7) to measure the mood status. (3) Results: In both groups, a similar percentage of patients had a past COVID-19 infection and similar opinions about pandemic-related inconveniences. The most significant limitations of the study included mask wearing and the restriction of social contact. Mental disorders were significantly more frequently reported in the DM group. Sleep problems were found in approximately 30% of patients. Approximately 20% of patients in both groups declared that the pandemic had negatively affected the quality of their sleep. The mean score of the GAD-7 scale in the HD group did not differ according to gender. In the group of DM patients, a significant difference was observed between men and women, with women scoring higher compared to men. In both groups, the percentage of patients with GAD-7 scores > 5, > 10 and > 15 did not differ significantly. (4) Conclusions: In both groups, chronically ill patients reported anxiety disorders with similar frequency. In the DM group, more severe anxiety disorders were found in women. Mental disorders were significantly more prevalent in DM patients. It seems that HD patients coped better with the psychological aspects of pandemic-related stress and limitations.

Adjuvant therapy in type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Not required for Clinical Vignette.